Welcome to Safe For Humans.

The site is in its beta form as we populate it with articles and links. Please take a look and let us know what you think.

About Safe For Humans

Safe For Humans is a consumer resource for news and information about toxins in our everday products, food, and building materials.

Products made for humans should be safe for humans.

Search
Help support SFH by shopping with Amazon.com
« Pediatricians urge tougher chemical safety law | Main | Check your sunscreen with Skin Deep- EWG's 2011 Sun screen Guide »
4:37PM

More on DNA mutating plastics, plus a great headline...

"USCC Fights to Keep Potentially Penis-Deforming Chemicals in Our Plastic"

As ThinkProgress reported yesterday, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce — one of the largest and most influential big business lobbying groups in the world — fired a letter off to Cass Sunstein, administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, telling him to block the regulation of extremely toxic chemicals in consumer plastics. Despite the overwhelming evidence of the dangers of such chemicals, the chamber letter declares that that EPA “lacks the sound regulatory science needed to meet the statutory threshold for a restriction or ban of the targeted chemicals.”

A wide body of scientific research has linked these chemicals, including phthalates and Bisphenol A (BPA), to declining birth rates, stillbirths, and an increasing number of birth defects. Many of the chemicals under review for increased regulation have already been banned in Europe and Canada.

Read the full article at thinkprogress.org

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: www.ccc-group.com
    Plastics have numerous utilizations in the medicinal field too, to incorporate polymer inserts, however the field of plastic surgery is not named for utilization of plastic material, yet rather the more non specific importance of the word pliancy with respect to the reshaping of substance.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>